Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trail Improvements results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 84 faulty-reasoning hits from 728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (15,322 of 23,471 topics). This Trail Improvements is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Trail Improvements
Topic details
Total words: 728
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles728 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos