Topic summary
93% 1 analyzed article/video 2,470 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technological Risks results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,427 hits . Analysis detected 14,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 68% (7,633 of 23,804 topics). This Technological Risks is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group. Technological Risks
Topic details
Total words: 9,880
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.9% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst