Topic summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video780 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suspension results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 1,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (12,754 of 23,574 topics). This Suspension is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Suspension
Topic details
Total words: 3,120
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos