Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Supervision Ambiental results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 252 hits. Analysis detected 1,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,490 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,194 topics). This Supervision Ambiental is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Supervision Ambiental
Topic details
Total words: 7,490
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos