Topic summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video929 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Impact results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 458 hits. Analysis detected 2,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (12,239 of 22,296 topics). This Student Impact is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Student Impact
Topic details
Total words: 3,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos