Topic summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Homelessness Prevention results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 1,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (16,407 of 22,631 topics). This Student Homelessness Prevention is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Student Homelessness Prevention
Topic details
Total words: 2,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos