Topic summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spiritual Guidance results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 158 hits. Analysis detected 893 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (14,572 of 22,667 topics). This Spiritual Guidance is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Spiritual Guidance
Topic details
Total words: 2,676
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos