Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Social Media Use results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Bandwagon, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 452 faulty-reasoning hits from 336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,411 topics). This Social Media Use is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Social Media Use
Topic details
Total words: 336
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles336 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 20.2%20.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 17.9%17.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 23.2%23.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.1%16.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.7%7.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.7%7.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos