Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Senate Committee On Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Red Herring, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 396 faulty-reasoning hits from 822 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,275 topics). This Senate Committee On Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Senate Committee On Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles822 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.5%6.5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 6.8%6.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Red Herring: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos