Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Education results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 954 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (12,943 of 23,407 topics). This Science Education is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Science Education
Topic details
Total words: 1,936
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos