Topic summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos986 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Budgets results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 373 hits. Analysis detected 2,024 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,698 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (16,521 of 22,568 topics). This School Budgets is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
School Budgets
Topic details
Total words: 4,698
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos