Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Russia US Relations results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 612 hits. Analysis detected 1,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 20,802 topics). This Russia US Relations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Russia US Relations
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,236
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.9%18.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos