Topic summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video2,250 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rural Vs Urban Issues results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 711 hits. Analysis detected 5,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (16,658 of 22,444 topics). This Rural Vs Urban Issues is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Rural Vs Urban Issues
Topic details
Total words: 9,000
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos