Topic summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rural Impact results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 1,221 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (6,351 of 23,166 topics). This Rural Impact is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Rural Impact
Topic details
Total words: 1,648
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.6% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.1%12.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos