Topic summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video1,071 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Right To Remain Silent results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 795 hits. Analysis detected 4,805 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (9,699 of 23,400 topics). This Right To Remain Silent is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Right To Remain Silent
Topic details
Total words: 4,284
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.6%18.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos