Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Reproductive Health Policy results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 787 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,450 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,488 topics). This Reproductive Health Policy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Reproductive Health Policy
Topic details
Total words: 1,450
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.7%19.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.8%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos