Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Regional Homelessness Authority results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 322 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,190 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,394 topics). This Regional Homelessness Authority is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Regional Homelessness Authority
Topic details
Total words: 2,190
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos