Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Reelection Campaign results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Special Pleading, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 234 faulty-reasoning hits from 604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Reelection Campaign is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Reelection Campaign
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles604 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.6%13.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Special Pleading: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos