Topic summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Referendums results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 1.7% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (19,503 of 22,683 topics). This Public Referendums is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Public Referendums
Topic details
Total words: 1,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.0% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos