Topic summary
⁠6%1 analyzed article/video975 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Funding For Housing results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Sunk Cost Effect, Anchoring Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 763 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (22,759 of 23,932 topics). This Public Funding For Housing is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
Public Funding For Housing
Topic details
Total words: 3,900
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751004.9% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos