Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video1,363 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Property Foreclosure results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 1,226 hits. Analysis detected 3,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (14,387 of 23,104 topics). This Property Foreclosure is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Property Foreclosure
Topic details
Total words: 5,452
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos