Topic summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Health results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 1,113 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (15,734 of 23,373 topics). This Player Health is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Player Health
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%4-H Schedule1%
⁠0%4 H Schedule1%
⁠0%Musician Biographies1%
⁠0%Class Analysis1%
⁠0%Cleveland Politics1%
⁠33%Player Health (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,592
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos