Topic summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video2,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pentagon Papers results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 3,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (20,237 of 23,519 topics). This Pentagon Papers is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Pentagon Papers
Topic details
Total words: 8,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.0% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.7%2.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.7%Special Pleading: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos