Topic summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pedestrian And Cyclist Safety results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.6% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 534 faulty-reasoning hits from 556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (868 of 23,635 topics). This Pedestrian And Cyclist Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Pedestrian And Cyclist Safety
Topic details
Total words: 556
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510096.3% percentile
12.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles556 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 14.0%14.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 26.6%26.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 19.2%19.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 26.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos