Topic summary
33% 1 analyzed article/video 424 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pasadena Events results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 168 hits . Analysis detected 878 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 57% (10,179 of 23,471 topics). This Pasadena Events is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Pasadena Events
Topic details
Total words: 1,696
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst