Topic summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Party Factions results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 2,557 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (3,828 of 22,012 topics). This Party Factions is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Party Factions
Topic details
Total words: 1,748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510082.6% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 15.4%15.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.4%14.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos