Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video641 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orlando Music Scene results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 1,355 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (13,141 of 23,203 topics). This Orlando Music Scene is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Orlando Music Scene
Topic details
Total words: 2,564
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.5%10.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos