Topic summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video1,266 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Open Records Act results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 418 hits. Analysis detected 2,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (17,382 of 23,320 topics). This Open Records Act is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Open Records Act
Topic details
Total words: 5,064
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos