Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olympic Policies results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 933 hits. Analysis detected 3,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,451 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (2,655 of 24,029 topics). This Olympic Policies is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Olympic Policies
Topic details
Total words: 2,451
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.0% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 38.1%38.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.5%22.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 38.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos