Topic summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Rodrigo results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 1,109 hits. Analysis detected 3,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (7,087 of 23,754 topics). This Olivia Rodrigo is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Olivia Rodrigo
Topic details
Total words: 3,456
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.1%32.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos