Topic summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video1,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Needle Exchange Programs results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 1,615 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (17,920 of 22,816 topics). This Needle Exchange Programs is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Needle Exchange Programs
Topic details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos