Topic summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Fringe Festival results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 558 hits. Analysis detected 1,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (16,795 of 23,864 topics). This Minnesota Fringe Festival is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Minnesota Fringe Festival
Topic details
Total words: 3,748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 14.9%14.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos