Topic summary
⁠93%2 analyzed articles/videos3,336 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Professionals results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 2,817 hits. Analysis detected 10,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,344 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (13,920 of 20,926 topics). This Medical Professionals is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Medical Professionals
Topic details
Total words: 13,344
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.1%21.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos