Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Maternal Mortality Rates results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 424 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,651 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 23,519 topics). This Maternal Mortality Rates is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Maternal Mortality Rates
Topic details
Total words: 3,651
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos