Topic summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video1,627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martha's Vineyard results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Status Quo Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 2.8% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,403 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (22,352 of 23,213 topics). This Martha's Vineyard is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
Martha's Vineyard
Topic details
Total words: 6,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751003.7% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos