Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video1,173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local Supervisor Race results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Status Quo Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 1,442 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (19,847 of 22,655 topics). This Local Supervisor Race is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
Local Supervisor Race
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,692
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510012.4% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Composition/Division: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos