Topic summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video1,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legislative Changes results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 376 hits. Analysis detected 2,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (16,039 of 23,582 topics). This Legislative Changes is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Legislative Changes
Topic details
Total words: 5,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos