Topic summary
⁠20%1 analyzed article/video508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Challenges To Government Databases results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 206 hits. Analysis detected 1,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (10,279 of 23,187 topics). This Legal Challenges To Government Databases is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Legal Challenges To Government Databases
Topic details
Total words: 2,032
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos