Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Impact Of Screens results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 366 hits. Analysis detected 2,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (13,686 of 22,330 topics). This Impact Of Screens is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Impact Of Screens
Topic details
Total words: 3,980
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos