Topic summary
⁠25%1 analyzed article/video915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immunization Rates results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 1,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (16,871 of 23,378 topics). This Immunization Rates is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Immunization Rates
Topic details
Total words: 3,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos