Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights In Iran results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 4,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (6,700 of 22,519 topics). This Human Rights In Iran is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Human Rights In Iran
Topic details
Total words: 3,636
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos