Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grant Approvals results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 278 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (19,215 of 22,927 topics). This Grant Approvals is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Grant Approvals
Topic details
Total words: 1,936
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.2% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–10%
0.0%2%4%6%8%10%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%2%2%4%4%6%6%8%8%10%10%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos