Topic summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video922 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Entry results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 1,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (18,972 of 22,879 topics). This Global Entry is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Global Entry
Topic details
Total words: 3,688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Composition/Division: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos