Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glen Hansard results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 512 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (4,925 of 23,525 topics). This Glen Hansard is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Glen Hansard
Topic details
Total words: 1,180
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.1% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.8%2.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos