Topic summary
⁠13%1 analyzed article/video622 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Freedom Laws results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 796 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (16,244 of 22,971 topics). This Food Freedom Laws is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Food Freedom Laws
Topic details
Total words: 2,488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos