Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food And Dining results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 680 hits. Analysis detected 3,123 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,849 of 18,154 topics). This Food And Dining is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Food And Dining
Topic details
Total words: 1,844
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.8% percentile
8.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 36.9%36.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 21.0%21.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 21.9%21.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.0%15.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 36.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos