Topic summary
24%1 analyzed article/video874 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Land Use results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 233 hits. Analysis detected 1,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (16,876 of 23,352 topics). This Federal Land Use is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Federal Land Use
Topic details
Total words: 3,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos