Topic summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video1,165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farmworker Advocacy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 577 hits. Analysis detected 3,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (8,237 of 23,082 topics). This Farmworker Advocacy is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Farmworker Advocacy
Topic details
Total words: 4,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510064.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos