Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Farm Economics results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 600 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (16,098 of 23,002 topics). This Farm Economics is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Farm Economics
Topic details
Total words: 1,852
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos