Topic summary
⁠98%2 analyzed articles/videos1,428 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fairness In Sports results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 1,312 hits. Analysis detected 6,920 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,895 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,058 of 24,029 topics). This Fairness In Sports is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Fairness In Sports
Topic details
Total words: 4,895
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 26.8%26.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.1%21.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 26.8%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos